<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Error Handling on DBJ Iceberg</title><link>https://iceberg.dbj.org/tags/error-handling/</link><description>Recent content in Error Handling on DBJ Iceberg</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://iceberg.dbj.org/tags/error-handling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why revisit it now?</title><link>https://iceberg.dbj.org/posts/c-dbj-error-concept-revisited/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://iceberg.dbj.org/posts/c-dbj-error-concept-revisited/</guid><description>Revisiting a 2019 idea: VALSTAT, a value-and-status alternative to C++ error handling — and why the AND still holds up.</description></item></channel></rss>